Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infections in Urologic Patients: Assessment of a Prospective Surveillance Program Including 10,000 Patients

Objective: Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (HUTI) represent a significant impairment in the quality of health care. Incidence in catheterized patients has been estimated at approximately 20%, however few data are available in urologic patients. We report a prospective surveillance program...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean urology Vol. 41; no. 5; pp. 483 - 489
Main Authors Merle, Veronique, Germain, Jeanne-Marie, Bugel, Hubert, Nouvellon, Michèle, Lemeland, Jean-François, Czernichow, Pierre, Grise, Philippe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier B.V 01.05.2002
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (HUTI) represent a significant impairment in the quality of health care. Incidence in catheterized patients has been estimated at approximately 20%, however few data are available in urologic patients. We report a prospective surveillance program over 6 years in our urologic department and evaluate its evolution. Methods: Population consists of all patients admitted to the urology ward for 48 hours or more over a 6-year period from 1994. Data recorded: age, gender, duration of stay, insertion and removal of catheters, diagnosis of HUTI. Analysis: calculation of incidence, and incidence density for HUTI and for catheter-related HUTI, analysis of trends by χ 2 trend test. Results: A total of 10,054 consecutive patients were included, 52% were catheterized. The median incidence of catheter-related HUTI in catheterized patients was 13.0%, the incidence density was 25.1 HUTI/1000 patient-days of catheterization. The proportion of HUTI and specific catheter-related HUTI patients decreased, respectively from 8.4% and 14.2% to 6.5% and 12.3% during the study period ( p<0.05). Conclusion: The rate of HUTI was not as high as previously reported, perhaps due to a controlled catheter policy. Surveillance was associated with a significant decrease in infection rates, suggesting a beneficial feedback effect. Evaluation of diagnoses and surgical procedures would ensure an optimal quality control program.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00069-6