“Pincer” Pyridine–Dicarbene–Iridium and ‐Ruthenium Complexes and Derivatives Thereof

The cationic pincer‐type complexes [IrI(CNMeC)L]X {CNMeC = [2,6‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene]‐3,5‐dimethylpyridine, L = CO, X = PF6 4; L = CH3CN, X = PF6 5; L = pyridine, X = BArF4, ArF = 3,5‐bis‐trifluoromethyl‐phenyl 6}, that were obtained from [IrI(CNMeC)Cl] (1) by displacement of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of inorganic chemistry Vol. 2020; no. 35; pp. 3359 - 3369
Main Authors Danopoulos, Andreas A., Braunstein, Pierre, Saßmannshausen, Jörg, Pugh, David, Wright, Joseph A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Weinheim Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 22.09.2020
Wiley-VCH Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The cationic pincer‐type complexes [IrI(CNMeC)L]X {CNMeC = [2,6‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene]‐3,5‐dimethylpyridine, L = CO, X = PF6 4; L = CH3CN, X = PF6 5; L = pyridine, X = BArF4, ArF = 3,5‐bis‐trifluoromethyl‐phenyl 6}, that were obtained from [IrI(CNMeC)Cl] (1) by displacement of the chloride ligand were structurally characterized. Complexes 4 and 5 adopt square planar, in‐plane distorted geometries, and in 6 the metal environment shows substantial pyramidalization. Theoretical calculations of the cations in 4 and 6 reproduce the experimental structures and rationalize their features. 1 undergoes oxidative transformations with CH2Cl2 to cis‐[IrIII(CNMeC)(CH2Cl)Cl2] (7) and with PhICl2 to mer‐[IrIII(CNMeC)Cl3] (8). The ruthenium derivatives trans‐[RuII(CNC)Cl2L] {CNC = [2,6‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazol‐2‐ylidene]‐pyridine, L = pyridine, 10} and [RuII(CNC)(η2,η2‐nbd)](X)2 . 2L (nbd = 2,5‐norbornadiene, L = CH3CN, X = BF4 11), were prepared by the reaction of cis‐trans‐[RuCl2(nbd)(py)2] and trans‐cis‐[RuCl2(nbd)(pip)2] (pip = piperidine) with the ligand CNC, respectively; both adopt distorted octahedral structures. The back‐bonding in 11 is comparable to that in its precursor complex, indicating minimal contribution of the NHC donors to this effect. Substitution of both chlorides in the known cis‐[RuII(CNC)Cl2L] (L = PPh3) by azido ligands gave cis‐[RuII(CNC)(N3)2L] (L = PPh3, 12), which by photolytic cleavage of the coordinated N3 failed to produce well‐defined complexes. Synthesis, reactivity, structures and bonding analyses of IrI pincer‐type complexes are reported. Specific geometrical distortions away from regular square‐planar are discussed in the context of NCI. Analogous RuII complexes are also presented.
ISSN:1434-1948
1099-0682
DOI:10.1002/ejic.202000429