The incidence of complications associated with lip and/or tongue piercings: a systematic review

Objective This review determines the incidence of complications associated with lip and/or tongue piercings based on a systematic evaluation of the available literature. Material and Methods MEDLINE–PubMed, Cochrane‐CENTRAL and EMBASE databases were comprehensively searched through June 2014 to iden...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of dental hygiene Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 62 - 73
Main Authors Hennequin-Hoenderdos, NL, Slot, DE, Van der Weijden, GA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective This review determines the incidence of complications associated with lip and/or tongue piercings based on a systematic evaluation of the available literature. Material and Methods MEDLINE–PubMed, Cochrane‐CENTRAL and EMBASE databases were comprehensively searched through June 2014 to identify appropriate studies. The incidence of complications, as established by a dental professional associated with oral and peri‐oral piercings, was evaluated in populations with lip and/or tongue piercings. The quality of the case–control studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. For case series studies, the risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence scale. Results An independent screening of 1580 unique titles and s revealed 15 publications that met the eligibility criteria. The incidence of gingival recessions appeared to be 50% in subjects with lip piercings and 44% in subjects with a tongue piercing. Tooth injuries were observed in 26% individuals with lip piercings and in up to 37% of individuals with tongue piercings. Subjects with a lip piercing were 4.14 times (P = 0.005) more likely to develop gingival recession than those without a lip piercing. Subjects with a tongue piercing were more likely than non‐pierced subjects to experience gingival recession (relative risk (RR) 2.77; P = 0.00001) and tooth injuries (RR 2.44; P = 0.003). Conclusion Both lip and tongue piercings are highly associated with the risk of gingival recession, and tongue piercings are also associated with tooth injuries.
Bibliography:istex:27835A8656112107408276749A782DE5D61DCA49
ark:/67375/WNG-HX09T1C4-W
ArticleID:IDH12118
Appendix S1. Method of quality assessment for assessing the quality of non-randomized case-control studies. Appendix S2. Overview of the studies and reason for exclusion after full-text reading. Appendix S3. Quality assessment of case series studies using the Quality Appraisal Checklist of the Institute of Health Economics (IHE). Appendix S4. Analysis of case-control studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Appendix S5. Overview of quality assessment of case-control studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Appendix S6. (A) Incidence of gingival recessions in lip pierced and non-pierced groups. (B) Incidence of tooth injury in lip pierced and non-pierced groups (C) Incidence of gingival recessions in tongue pierced and non-pierced groups (D) Incidence of tooth injury in tongue pierced and non-pierced groups.
Dutch organization
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:1601-5029
1601-5037
DOI:10.1111/idh.12118