Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers' intentions

Social psychologists' attitude‐behavior theories can contribute to understanding science teachers' behaviors. Such understanding can, in turn, be used to improve professional development. This article describes leading attitude‐behavior theories and summarizes results from past tests of th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of research in science teaching Vol. 39; no. 9; pp. 819 - 844
Main Author Zint, Michaela
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.11.2002
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Social psychologists' attitude‐behavior theories can contribute to understanding science teachers' behaviors. Such understanding can, in turn, be used to improve professional development. This article describes leading attitude‐behavior theories and summarizes results from past tests of these theories. A study predicting science teachers' intention to incorporate environmental risk education based on these theories is also reported. Data for that study were collected through a mail questionnaire (n = 1336, radjusted = 80%) and analyzed using confirmatory factor and multiple regression analysis. All determinants of intention to act in the Theory of Reasoned Action and Theory of Planned Behavior and some determinants in the Theory of Trying predicted science teachers' environmental risk education intentions. Given the consistency of results across studies, the Theory of Planned Behavior augmented with past behavior is concluded to provide the best attitude‐behavior model for predicting science teachers' intention to act. Thus, science teachers' attitude toward the behavior, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norm need to be enhanced to modify their behavior. Based on the Theory of Trying, improving their attitude toward the process and toward success, and expectations of success may also result in changes. Future research should focus on identifying determinants that can further enhance the ability of these theories to predict and explain science teachers' behaviors. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 819–844, 2002
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-2N910SZH-6
istex:8C8275C18B0E0514D02FE799A05DAA63E234AEE6
ArticleID:TEA10047
State of Michigan
Office of Sea Grant, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - No. 1N89AA-D-SG083
ISSN:0022-4308
1098-2736
DOI:10.1002/tea.10047