Evidence-based genetic counselling implications for Huntington disease intermediate allele predictive test results

Intermediate alleles (IAs) for Huntington disease (HD) contain 27–35 CAG repeats, a range that falls just below the disease threshold of 36 repeats. While there is no firm evidence that IAs confer the HD phenotype, they are prone to germline CAG repeat instability, particularly repeat expansion when...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical genetics Vol. 85; no. 4; pp. 303 - 311
Main Authors Semaka, A., Hayden, M.R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Intermediate alleles (IAs) for Huntington disease (HD) contain 27–35 CAG repeats, a range that falls just below the disease threshold of 36 repeats. While there is no firm evidence that IAs confer the HD phenotype, they are prone to germline CAG repeat instability, particularly repeat expansion when paternally transmitted. Consequently, offspring may inherit a new mutation and develop the disease later in life. Over the last 5 years there has been a renewed interest in IAs. This article provides an overview of the latest research on IAs, including their clinical implications, frequency, haplotype, and likelihood of CAG repeat expansion, as well as patient understanding and current genetic counselling practices. The implications of this growing evidence base for clinical practice are also highlighted. These evidence‐based genetic counselling implications may help ensure individuals with an IA predictive test result receive appropriate support, education, and counselling.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CGE12324
Smith Foundation for Health Research
istex:CEDD5EA7626C1B70441A95221D37B67AF4F0A8C6
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
ark:/67375/WNG-GKNHM3DZ-T
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0009-9163
1399-0004
DOI:10.1111/cge.12324