Efficient Algorithms for Hierarchical Graph-Based Segmentation Relying on the Felzenszwalb–Huttenlocher Dissimilarity

Hierarchical image segmentation provides a region-oriented scale-space, i.e. a set of image segmentations at different detail levels in which the segmentations at finer levels are nested with respect to those at coarser levels. However, most image segmentation algorithms, among which a graph-based i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (IJPRAI) Vol. 33; no. 11; p. 1940008
Main Authors Cahuina, Edward Cayllahua, Cousty, Jean, Kenmochi, Yukiko, de Albuquerque Araújo, Arnaldo, Cámara-Chávez, Guillermo, Guimarães, Silvio Jamil F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore World Scientific Publishing Company 01.10.2019
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte., Ltd
World Scientific
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Hierarchical image segmentation provides a region-oriented scale-space, i.e. a set of image segmentations at different detail levels in which the segmentations at finer levels are nested with respect to those at coarser levels. However, most image segmentation algorithms, among which a graph-based image segmentation method relying on a region merging criterion was proposed by Felzenszwalb–Huttenlocher in 2004, do not lead to a hierarchy. In order to cope with a demand for hierarchical segmentation, Guimarães et al. proposed in 2012 a method for hierarchizing the popular Felzenszwalb–Huttenlocher method, without providing an algorithm to compute the proposed hierarchy. This paper is devoted to providing a series of algorithms to compute the result of this hierarchical graph-based image segmentation method efficiently, based mainly on two ideas: optimal dissimilarity measuring and incremental update of the hierarchical structure. Experiments show that, for an image of size 321 × 481 pixels, the most efficient algorithm produces the result in half a second whereas the most naive one requires more than 4 h.
ISSN:0218-0014
1793-6381
1793-6381
DOI:10.1142/S0218001419400081