Randomized trial of allergen-induced asthmatic response in smokers and non-smokers: effects of inhaled corticosteroids

Summary Background It is thought that asthmatics who smoke cigarettes respond less well to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy than asthmatics who do not smoke. Objective To evaluate the effects of smoking on allergen‐induced airway responses in asthmatics treated with ICS. Methods Randomized, doub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical and experimental allergy Vol. 45; no. 10; pp. 1531 - 1541
Main Authors Cahn, A., Boyce, M., Mistry, S., Musani, N., Rambaran, C., Storey, J., Ventresca, P., Michel, O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background It is thought that asthmatics who smoke cigarettes respond less well to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy than asthmatics who do not smoke. Objective To evaluate the effects of smoking on allergen‐induced airway responses in asthmatics treated with ICS. Methods Randomized, double‐blind, crossover study evaluating twice daily fluticasone propionate (FP) 100 μg, FP 500 μg and placebo, for 7 days, on allergen‐induced asthmatic responses in 18 non‐smoking and 17 smoking atopic asthmatics (NCT01400906). At 1 h post‐morning dose on Day 6, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was measured up to 10 h post‐challenge. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), induced sputum cell counts, and responsiveness to methacholine were assessed the following day. Results The late asthmatic response (LAR) was suppressed by FP in smokers and non‐smokers; with placebo, the LAR was also attenuated in smokers versus non‐smokers (adjusted mean minimum change in FEV1 (L) over 4–10 h [95% CI] in non‐smokers: placebo −1.01 [1.31, 0.70], FP 100 μg −0.38 [0.54, 0.22], FP 500 μg −0.35 [0.54–0.22]; and in smokers: placebo −0.63 [0.84, 0.43]; FP 100 μg −0.44 [0.65, 0.23]; FP 500 μg −0.46 [0.59–0.32]). The Early AR was suppressed by FP treatment in non‐smokers, but was not impacted in smokers. The reduction in methacholine hyperresponsiveness after FP was greater in non‐smokers (1.5‐ and twofold doubling dose difference from placebo after FP 100 μg and FP 500 μg) than smokers (1.0 and 1.3 difference, respectively). Allergen‐induced increases in eNO and sputum eosinophils were lower in smokers than non‐smokers and were suppressed in both groups by FP. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance Allergen‐induced LARs were of a similar amplitude in both smoking and non‐smoking atopic asthmatics at the end of ICS treatment, but attenuation of the LAR in smokers was only partly associated with ICS treatment. The marked attenuation of the LAR observed in smokers in the absence of ICS treatment is a novel observation.
Bibliography:istex:352E6C8537E768F06DF41F06AFF3204B732DD57E
ark:/67375/WNG-HL60C754-W
ArticleID:CEA12610
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) - No. NCT01400906
Figure S1. Allergen challenge time course of mean change in post-saline FEV1 (95% CI) on Day 6 of a) placebo, b) FP 100µg bd and c) FP 500 µg bd, in non-smokers and smokers excluding 8 protocol violators  Figure S2. Adjusted mean treatment differences (95% CI) in post-saline FEV1 by time on Day 6 following treatment with a) FP 100µg bd and b) FP 500 µg bd Figure S3. Adjusted mean allergen challenge time course of change in post-saline FEV1 (95% CI) on Day 6 of a) placebo, b) FP 100µg bd and c) FP 500 µg bd in non-smokers and smokers excluding subjects challenged with grass pollen  Figure S4. Adjusted Geometric Means (95% CI) of sputum neutrophil cell count post allergen challenge on Day 7Table S1. Details of screening allergen challenge protocol violators Table S2. Summary of loge transformed exhaled No data (ppb
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-7894
1365-2222
DOI:10.1111/cea.12610