Generic and customised digital image enhancement filters for the visually impaired

This study compares the effectiveness of various image enhancement filters for improving the perceived visibility of coloured digital natural images for people with visual impairment. Generic filters were compared with Peli’s adaptive enhancement and adaptive thresholding and custom-devised filters...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVision research (Oxford) Vol. 45; no. 15; pp. 1991 - 2007
Main Authors Leat, Susan J., Omoruyi, Gloria, Kennedy, Andrew, Jernigan, Ed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study compares the effectiveness of various image enhancement filters for improving the perceived visibility of coloured digital natural images for people with visual impairment. Generic filters were compared with Peli’s adaptive enhancement and adaptive thresholding and custom-devised filters based on each subject’s contrast sensitivity loss. Subjects with low vision made within filter rankings followed by between filter ratings. In general, subjects preferred filters with lower gains. Unsharp masking resulted in a significant increase in perceived visibility for some image types ( p ⩽ 0.05) while Peli’s adaptive enhancement, edge enhancement and histogram equalization resulted in borderline improvements. Adaptive thresholding and the custom devised filter did not result in overall improvements in perceived visibility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0042-6989
1878-5646
DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.028