Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking
Performing two similar tasks at the same time requires the shielding of the prioritized Task 1 from interference of additional Task 2 processing (between-task interference). In the present study we tested how motivational factors such as prospect of reward might drive shifts between increased proact...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta psychologica Vol. 191; pp. 112 - 123 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Netherlands
Elsevier B.V
01.11.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0001-6918 1873-6297 1873-6297 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Performing two similar tasks at the same time requires the shielding of the prioritized Task 1 from interference of additional Task 2 processing (between-task interference). In the present study we tested how motivational factors such as prospect of reward might drive shifts between increased proactive control, enabling task shielding, and reduced proactive control resulting in relaxed task shielding. In Experiment 1 an instruction-induced prioritization of Task 1 over Task 2 resulted in initially reduced between-task interference. With increasing time on task, however, between-task interference continuously increased, presumably because participants engaged less in proactive control resulting in reduced task shielding. In Experiment 2 the prospect of reward activated proactive control as indicated by reduced between-task interference in the Reward than in the No reward condition. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the performance of a Reward and a No reward group in a between-subject design. Whereas between-task interference again continuously increased over time in the No reward group, indicating a relaxed mode of task shielding, the Reward group displayed constant small between-task interference over time, suggesting maintained high levels of task shielding. Together these findings speak in favor of an impressive flexibility in regulating cognitive control engagement in multitasking situations. This not only shows the capacity for optimization of multitasking performance by motivational incentives but also further supports assumptions of the strategic nature of assumed processing limitations (bottlenecks) in dual-task performance.
•Motivational factors determine the degree of between-task interference in dual-task performance•Prospect of reward drives shifts between increased/reduced proactive control enabling increased/relaxed task shielding•Time on task results in relaxed task shielding which is counteracted by prospect of reward•Findings speak in favor of an impressive flexibility in control regulation in dual tasks•Findings support assumptions of the strategic nature of assumed processing limitations |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0001-6918 1873-6297 1873-6297 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002 |