Shielding and relaxation in multitasking: Prospect of reward counteracts relaxation of task shielding in multitasking

Performing two similar tasks at the same time requires the shielding of the prioritized Task 1 from interference of additional Task 2 processing (between-task interference). In the present study we tested how motivational factors such as prospect of reward might drive shifts between increased proact...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa psychologica Vol. 191; pp. 112 - 123
Main Authors Fischer, Rico, Fröber, Kerstin, Dreisbach, Gesine
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.11.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0001-6918
1873-6297
1873-6297
DOI10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Performing two similar tasks at the same time requires the shielding of the prioritized Task 1 from interference of additional Task 2 processing (between-task interference). In the present study we tested how motivational factors such as prospect of reward might drive shifts between increased proactive control, enabling task shielding, and reduced proactive control resulting in relaxed task shielding. In Experiment 1 an instruction-induced prioritization of Task 1 over Task 2 resulted in initially reduced between-task interference. With increasing time on task, however, between-task interference continuously increased, presumably because participants engaged less in proactive control resulting in reduced task shielding. In Experiment 2 the prospect of reward activated proactive control as indicated by reduced between-task interference in the Reward than in the No reward condition. In Experiment 3, we directly compared the performance of a Reward and a No reward group in a between-subject design. Whereas between-task interference again continuously increased over time in the No reward group, indicating a relaxed mode of task shielding, the Reward group displayed constant small between-task interference over time, suggesting maintained high levels of task shielding. Together these findings speak in favor of an impressive flexibility in regulating cognitive control engagement in multitasking situations. This not only shows the capacity for optimization of multitasking performance by motivational incentives but also further supports assumptions of the strategic nature of assumed processing limitations (bottlenecks) in dual-task performance. •Motivational factors determine the degree of between-task interference in dual-task performance•Prospect of reward drives shifts between increased/reduced proactive control enabling increased/relaxed task shielding•Time on task results in relaxed task shielding which is counteracted by prospect of reward•Findings speak in favor of an impressive flexibility in control regulation in dual tasks•Findings support assumptions of the strategic nature of assumed processing limitations
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6918
1873-6297
1873-6297
DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.002