Additive effects of the chemokine receptor 2, vitamin D receptor, interleukin-6 polymorphisms and cardiovascular risk factors on the prevalence of myocardial infarction in patients below 65 years

Cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) have been associated with myocardial infarction (MI), while the role of genetic risk factors (GRF) remains undetermined. Cineventriculograms of 3436 were analyzed for presence of regional function impairment as sign of MI. Genotyping for genetic polymorphism (vitami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of cardiology Vol. 105; no. 1; pp. 90 - 95
Main Authors Ortlepp, Jan R., Krantz, Constanze, Kimmel, Melanie, von Korff, Alexei, Vesper, Katharina, Schmitz, Fabian, Mevissen, Vera, Janssens, Uwe, Franke, Andreas, Hanrath, Peter, Zerres, Klaus, Hoffmann, Rainer
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Shannon Elsevier Ireland Ltd 20.10.2005
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cardiovascular risk factors (CRF) have been associated with myocardial infarction (MI), while the role of genetic risk factors (GRF) remains undetermined. Cineventriculograms of 3436 were analyzed for presence of regional function impairment as sign of MI. Genotyping for genetic polymorphism (vitamin D receptor VDR BsmI, interleukin-6 IL6-174 G/C, chemokine receptor 2 CCR2 64 V/I) was performed. CRF were assessed (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and diabetes mellitus). In patients < 65 years ( n = 1946) genotypes (VDR BB, IL6 GC/CC, CCR2 VI/II, defined as GRF) were significantly associated with the presence of MI (BB: OR 1.38, 95%CI 1.07–1.79, p = 0.016 GC/CC: 1.28, 95%CI 1.03–1.60, p = 0.028 VI/II: 1.49, 95%CI 1.17–1.88, p = 0.001). Combining four CRF (14% vs. 21% vs. 27% vs. 31% vs. 38%, p < 0.0001) and three GRF (21% vs. 25% vs. 32% vs. 44%, p < 0.0001) revealed additive effects on the prevalence of MI. The more combined CRF and GRF were present (from 0 to 7) the higher was the prevalence of MI (11% vs. 12% vs. 21% vs. 27% vs. 30% vs. 34% vs. 59%, p < 0.0001). Age was not associated with MI. In patients ≥ 65 years ( n = 1490) the combination of CRF was only weakly associated with MI, while GRF were not. In these patients age was a predictor of MI. Certain GRF might have additive but small effects on the disposition for MI before the age of 65. In older patients the tested GRF had no effect, possibly indicating a mechanism of aging rather than a purely genetic determined entity. Given the small effect of the tested genetic polymorphisms the value of testing GRF remains uncertain.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.03.004