The influence of puberty onset, Body Mass Index, and pressure to be thin on disordered eating behaviors in children and adolescents

The main objective of this study is to verify the hypothesis that pubertal development, obesity, body satisfaction, as well as family and peer influences predict unhealthy eating habits in children and adolescents. A randomized stratified sample of young Quebecers aged 9, 13, and 16 years on March 3...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEating behaviors : an international journal Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 75 - 83
Main Authors Tremblay, Line, Lariviere, Michel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2009
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The main objective of this study is to verify the hypothesis that pubertal development, obesity, body satisfaction, as well as family and peer influences predict unhealthy eating habits in children and adolescents. A randomized stratified sample of young Quebecers aged 9, 13, and 16 years on March 31, 1999 [608 children aged of 9 years (325 girls and 283 boys) and 662 adolescents aged of 13 and 16 years (349 girls and 313 boys)] were used. Children's weight, height, and Body Mass Index (BMI) were recorded. Questionnaires were administered to children and a parent (usually the mother). Among 9-year-old children, this study found that weight loss or weight control behaviors were predicted mainly by the onset of puberty, lower maternal abusive control, and the level of peer pressure. Among adolescents, mother's BMI, income, peer pressure, and negative comments about the child's weight most strongly predicted behaviors to control weight, strategies to lose weight and the frequency of such behaviors. The findings suggest that both parents and children need to understand the impact of comments on a child's behavior.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1471-0153
1873-7358
DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2008.12.001