Lansoprazole-based triple therapy versus ranitidine bismuth citrate-based dual therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer: a multicenter, randomized, double-dummy study

Background: The optimal treatment regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer has yet to be determined. Based on a search of MEDLINE ® no studies have been performed comparing a proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen with a ranitidine bismuth citrate (R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical therapeutics Vol. 23; no. 5; pp. 761 - 770
Main Authors Luzza, Francesco, Giglio, Andrea, Ciliberto, Enrico, Belmonte, Angelo, Cavaliere, Cesare, Saccá, Natale, Frandina, Chiara, Fiocca, Roberto, Trimboli, Vincenzo, Pallone, Francesco
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Belle Mead, NJ EM Inc USA 01.05.2001
Excerpta Medica
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The optimal treatment regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer has yet to be determined. Based on a search of MEDLINE ® no studies have been performed comparing a proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen with a ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)—based dual therapy regimen, both containing clarithromycin. Objective: This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of lansoprazole (LAN)-based triple therapy with that of RBC-based dual therapy in H pylori—infected patients with duodenal ulcer. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive either 1 week of triple therapy with LAN 30 mg BID, clarithromycin 500 mg BID, and tinidazole 500 mg BID, followed by 3 weeks of LAN 30 mg BID, or 2 weeks of dual therapy with RBC 400 mg BID plus clarithromycin 500 mg BID, followed by 2 weeks of RBC 400 mg BID. Eradication of H pylori was defined as negative results on both the urease quick test and histologic examination ≥4 weeks after the end of treatment. Duodenal healing and recurrence rates were assessed endoscopically at 8 weeks and 6 months. A per-protocol (PP) analysis was conducted for each efficacy end point. Also conducted were an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis in which patients with missing data were considered failures, and an observed analysis (OBS), which included patients with an evaluable result after treatment, regardless of compliance. Results: One hundred eighty-five patients (126 men, 59 women; age range, 18–76 years; mean age, 43 years) were enrolled and randomized to treatment. In the LAN and RBC groups, respectively, H pylori eradication rates were 92.6%, 93.1%, and 72.8% versus 78.6%, 77.9%, and 64.5% in the PP ( P = 0.02), OBS ( P = 0.01), and ITT analyses. The corresponding duodenal ulcer healing rates were 98.6%, 98.7%, and 83.7% versus 90.8%, 91.5%, and 81.7%; these differences were not statistically significant. Side effects were mild, occurring in 20.7% of LAN patients and 17.2% of RBC patients. Ulcer recurred in 2 RBC patients. No difference was observed between treatments in terms of the occurrence of gastritis or improvement of symptoms. Conclusion: Based on the results of the PP and OBS analyses, LAN-based triple therapy was superior to RBC-based dual therapy for the eradication of H pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer.
ISSN:0149-2918
1879-114X
DOI:10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80025-4