Hydrogen adsorption, absorption and diffusion on and in transition metal surfaces: A DFT study

Periodic, self-consistent DFT-GGA(PW91) calculations are used to study the interaction of hydrogen with different facets of seventeen transition metals—the (100) and (111) facets of face-centered cubic (fcc) metals, the (0001) facet of hexagonal-close packed (hcp) metals, and the (100) and (110) fac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurface science Vol. 606; no. 7-8; pp. 679 - 689
Main Authors Ferrin, Peter, Kandoi, Shampa, Nilekar, Anand Udaykumar, Mavrikakis, Manos
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01.04.2012
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Periodic, self-consistent DFT-GGA(PW91) calculations are used to study the interaction of hydrogen with different facets of seventeen transition metals—the (100) and (111) facets of face-centered cubic (fcc) metals, the (0001) facet of hexagonal-close packed (hcp) metals, and the (100) and (110) facets of body-centered cubic (bcc) metals. Calculated geometries and binding energies for surface and subsurface hydrogen are reported and are, in general, in good agreement with both previous modeling studies and experimental data. There are significant differences between the binding on the close-packed and more open (100) facets of the same metal. Geometries of subsurface hydrogen on different facets of the same metal are generally similar; however, binding energies of hydrogen in the subsurface of the different facets studied showed significant variation. Formation of surface hydrogen is exothermic with respect to gas-phase H2 on all metals studied with the exception of Ag and Au. For each metal studied, hydrogen in its preferred subsurface state is always less stable than its preferred surface state. The magnitude of the activation energy for hydrogen diffusion from the surface layer into the first subsurface layer is dominated by the difference in the thermodynamic stability of these two states. Diffusion from the first subsurface layer to one layer further into the bulk does not generally have a large thermodynamic barrier but still has a moderate kinetic barrier. Despite the proximity to the metal surface, the activation energy for hydrogen diffusion from the first to the second subsurface layer is generally similar to experimentally-determined activation energies for bulk diffusion found in the literature. There are also some significant differences in the activation energy for hydrogen diffusion into the bulk through different facets of the same metal. ► First-principles study of the energetics for hydrogen adsorption, absorption, and diffusion. ► 17 different metals single crystal surfaces, close-packed and more open. ► Structure-sensitivity of these fundamental processes. ► Comprehensive review of the related published work, theoretical and experimental.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0039-6028
1879-2758
DOI:10.1016/j.susc.2011.12.017