Muscle strengthening is not effective in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review

• Published in: Australian journal of physiotherapy Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 81 - 87
• Main Authors: Scianni, Aline, Butler, Jane M., Ada, Louise, Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Australia Copyright Agency Limited (Distributor) 01.01.2009
• Subjects: Adolescent; Biofeedback, Psychology - physiology; Cerebral palsy; Cerebral Palsy - physiopathology; Cerebral Palsy - therapy; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Meta-analysis; Muscle Strength - physiology; Muscle weakness; Physical Therapy Modalities; Physical therapy techniques; Randomised controlled trials; Rehabilitation; Resistance Training; Review systematic; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult; Cerebral palsy; Muscle weakness; Randomised controlled trials; Review systematic; Physical therapy techniques; Rehabilitation; Children; Meta-analysis
• ISSN: 0004-9514; 1836-9553; 1449-2059; 1836-9561
• DOI: 10.1016/S0004-9514(09)70037-6

Do strengthening interventions increase strength without increasing spasticity and improve activity, and is there any carryover after cessation in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy? Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials. Children with spastic cerebral palsy between school age and 20 years. Strengthening interventions that involved repetitive, strong, or effortful muscle contractions and progressed as ability changed, such as biofeedback, electrical stimulation, and progressive resistance exercise. Strength was measured as continuous measures of maximum voluntary force or torque production. Spasticity was measured as velocity-dependent resistance to passive stretch. Activity was measured as continuous measures, eg, 10-m Walk Test, or using scales eg, the Gross Motor Function Measure. Six studies were identified and five had data that could be included in a metaanalysis. Strengthening interventions had no effect on strength (SMD 0.20, 95% CI −0.17 to 0.56), no effect on walking speed (MD 0.02 m/s, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.16), and had a small statistically-significant but not clinically-worthwhile effect on Gross Motor Function Measure (MD 2%, 95% CI 0 to 4). Only one study measured spasticity but did not report the between-group analysis. In children and adolescents with cerebral palsy who are walking, the current evidence suggests that strengthening interventions are neither effective nor worthwhile.