Oestrous phase cyclicity influences judgment biasing in rats

•Identification of cognitive bias has become an important measure of animal welfare.•Limited understanding on the effects of oestrous phase on bias detection.•Rats in the dioestrous phase responded with more pessimistic biases.•Subordinate rats responded with more pessimistic biases.•No interaction...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBehavioural processes Vol. 157; pp. 678 - 684
Main Authors Barker, Timothy Hugh, Kind, Karen Lee, Groves, Peta Danielle, Howarth, Gordon Stanley, Whittaker, Alexandra Louise
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier B.V 01.12.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Identification of cognitive bias has become an important measure of animal welfare.•Limited understanding on the effects of oestrous phase on bias detection.•Rats in the dioestrous phase responded with more pessimistic biases.•Subordinate rats responded with more pessimistic biases.•No interaction between oestrous phase and social status. The identification of cognitive bias has become an important measure of animal welfare. Negative cognitive biases develop from a tendency for animals to process novel information pessimistically. Judgment-bias testing is the commonplace methodology to detect cognitive biases. However, concerns with these methods have been frequently-reported; one of which being the discrepancy between male and female cognitive expression. The current study assessed the factors of social status and oestrus, to investigate whether oestrous cycle rotation, or subordination stress encouraged an increase in pessimistic responses. Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 24) were trained on an active-choice judgment bias paradigm. Responses to the ambiguous probe were recorded as optimistic or pessimistic. Oestrous phase was determined by assessing vaginal cytology in stained vaginal cell smears. Rats in the dioestrous phase and those rats considered to be subordinate demonstrated an increased percentage of pessimistic responses. However, no interaction between these factors was observed. This suggests that oestrous cyclicity can influence the judgment biases of female animals; a previously unreported finding. On this basis, researchers should be encouraged to account for both oestrous phase cyclicity and social status as an additional fixed effect in study design.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0376-6357
1872-8308
DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.020