Immediate versus Postponed Intervention for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis
A multicenter, randomized trial of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis evaluated immediate drainage within 24 hours after infected necrosis was diagnosed as compared with postponed drainage. Immediate drainage was not superior to postponed drainage in reducing complications. Patients ass...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 385; no. 15; pp. 1372 - 1381 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Massachusetts Medical Society
07.10.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A multicenter, randomized trial of patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis evaluated immediate drainage within 24 hours after infected necrosis was diagnosed as compared with postponed drainage. Immediate drainage was not superior to postponed drainage in reducing complications. Patients assigned to immediate drainage underwent a greater number of invasive procedures. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa2100826 |