A prospective randomized study comparing modified Burch retropubic urethropexy and suburethral sling for treatment of genuine stress incontinence with low-pressure urethra

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare a modified Burch procedure with a suburethral sling for the treatment of stress incontinence complicated by a low-pressure urethra. Study Design: Thirty-six women with stress incontinence, low-pressure urethra, and urethral hypermobility (straining cot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 182; no. 1; pp. 30 - 34
Main Authors Sand, Peter K., Winkler, Harvey, Blackhurst, Dawn W., Culligan, Patrick J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Philadelphia, PA Elsevier Inc 01.01.2000
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare a modified Burch procedure with a suburethral sling for the treatment of stress incontinence complicated by a low-pressure urethra. Study Design: Thirty-six women with stress incontinence, low-pressure urethra, and urethral hypermobility (straining cotton swab angle ≥30°) were randomly assigned to undergo either a modified Burch procedure (n = 19) or a suburethral sling (n = 17). Objective and subjective cure rates at 3 months after the operation were the primary outcome measures. Comparisons of group means were performed with the Student t test for independent groups, and proportions were compared with the Fisher exact test. Results: After the operation the 2 groups had statistically similar cure rates and voiding function. Urethral closure pressure, pressure transmission ratios, and maximum detrusor pressure during voiding were significantly higher in the sling group. Conclusion: At 3 months there were no clinically significant differences between the groups treated with suburethral sling and modified Burch procedures. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:30-4.)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70487-X