An assessment of the retention behaviour of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on reversed phase stationary phases: Selectivity and retention on C18 and phenyl-type surfaces

In this manuscript the retention and selectivity of a set of linear and non-linear PAHs were evaluated on five different reversed-phase columns. These phases included C18 and C18 Aqua stationary phases, as well as three phenyl phases: Propyl-phenyl, Synergi polar-RP and Cosmosil 5PBB phase. Overall,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Chromatography A Vol. 1126; no. 1; pp. 283 - 297
Main Authors Kayillo, Sindy, Dennis, Gary R., Shalliker, R. Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 08.09.2006
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In this manuscript the retention and selectivity of a set of linear and non-linear PAHs were evaluated on five different reversed-phase columns. These phases included C18 and C18 Aqua stationary phases, as well as three phenyl phases: Propyl-phenyl, Synergi polar-RP and Cosmosil 5PBB phase. Overall, the results revealed that the phenyl-type columns offered better separation performance for the linear PAHs, while the separation of the structural isomer PAHs was enhanced on the C18 columns. The Propyl-phenyl column was found to have the highest molecular-stationary phase interactions, as evidenced by the greatest rate of change in ‘ S’ (0.71) as a function of the molecular weight in the PAH homologous series, despite having the lowest surface coverage (3% carbon load) (where S is the slope of a plot of log k versus the solvent composition). In contrast, the C18 Aqua column, having the highest surface coverage (15% carbon load) was found to have the second lowest molecular-stationary phase interactions (rate of change in S = 0.61). Interestingly, the Synergi polar-RP column, which also is a phenyl stationary phase behaved more ‘C18-like’ than ‘phenyl-like’ in many of the tests undertaken. This is probably not unexpected since all five phases were reversed phase.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9673
DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.04.054