Cancer information disclosure in different cultural contexts

The relationship between truth telling and culture has been the subject of increasing attention in the literature. The issue of whether, how and how much to tell cancer patients concerning diagnosis is still approached differently depending on country and culture. The majority of physicians tell the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSupportive care in cancer Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 147 - 154
Main Authors Mystakidou, Kyriaki, Parpa, Efi, Tsilila, Eleni, Katsouda, Emmanuela, Vlahos, Lambros
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Springer Nature B.V 01.03.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The relationship between truth telling and culture has been the subject of increasing attention in the literature. The issue of whether, how and how much to tell cancer patients concerning diagnosis is still approached differently depending on country and culture. The majority of physicians tell the truth more often today than in the past, in both developed and developing countries, but most of them prefer to disclose the truth to the next of kin. Nurses in Anglo-Saxon countries are considered to be the most suitable health-care professionals for the patients to share their thoughts and feelings with. Nevertheless, in most other cultures the final decision on information disclosure lies with the treating physician. Regardless of cultural origin, the diagnosis of cancer affects both family structure and family dynamics. In most cases patients' families, in an effort to protect them from despair and a feeling of hopelessness, exclude the patient from the process of information exchange. The health-care team-patient relationship is a triangle consisting of the health-care professional, the patient and the family. Each part supports the other two and is affected by the cultural background of each of the others as well as the changes that occur within the triangle.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-003-0552-7