Can we understand population healthcare needs using electronic medical records?

• Published in: Singapore medical journal Vol. 60; no. 9; pp. 446 - 453
• Main Authors: Chong, Jia Loon, Low, Lian Leng, Chan, Darren Yak Leong, Shen, Yuzeng, Thin, Thiri Naing, Ong, Marcus Eng Hock, Matchar, David Bruce
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Singapore Singapore Medical Association 01.09.2019
• Subjects: Algorithms; Electronic Health Records; Emergency Medicine - methods; Emergency Service, Hospital; Health Services Needs and Demand; Hospitals; Humans; Incidence; Needs Assessment; Nurses; Original; Patient-Centered Care; Physicians; Prospective Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Singapore; Singapore; needs assessment; electronic health records; patient-centred care; healthcare evaluation mechanisms
• ISSN: 0037-5675
• DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2019012

The identification of population-level healthcare needs using hospital electronic medical records (EMRs) is a promising approach for the evaluation and development of tailored healthcare services. Population segmentation based on healthcare needs may be possible using information on health and social service needs from EMRs. However, it is currently unknown if EMRs from restructured hospitals in Singapore provide information of sufficient quality for this purpose. We compared the inter-rater reliability between a population segment that was assigned prospectively and one that was assigned retrospectively based on EMR review. 200 non-critical patients aged ≥ 55 years were prospectively evaluated by clinicians for their healthcare needs in the emergency department at Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. Trained clinician raters with no prior knowledge of these patients subsequently accessed the EMR up to the prospective rating date. A similar healthcare needs evaluation was conducted using the EMR. The inter-rater reliability between the two rating sets was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa and the incidence of missing information was tabulated. The inter-rater reliability for the medical 'global impression' rating was 0.37 for doctors and 0.35 for nurses. The inter-rater reliability for the same variable, retrospectively rated by two doctors, was 0.75. Variables with a higher incidence of missing EMR information such as 'social support in case of need' and 'patient activation' had poorer inter-rater reliability. Pre-existing EMR systems may not capture sufficient information for reliable determination of healthcare needs. Thus, we should consider integrating policy-relevant healthcare need variables into EMRs.