Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability

Among patients with a low clinical pretest probability of pulmonary embolism and a d -dimer level of less than 1000 ng per milliliter (twice the usual threshold used to rule out the disorder), the need for diagnostic imaging was reduced from 51.9% to 34.3% of patients, without increasing the risk of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 381; no. 22; pp. 2125 - 2134
Main Authors Kearon, Clive, de Wit, Kerstin, Parpia, Sameer, Schulman, Sam, Afilalo, Marc, Hirsch, Andrew, Spencer, Frederick A, Sharma, Sangita, D’Aragon, Frédérick, Deshaies, Jean-François, Le Gal, Gregoire, Lazo-Langner, Alejandro, Wu, Cynthia, Rudd-Scott, Lisa, Bates, Shannon M, Julian, Jim A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Massachusetts Medical Society 28.11.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Among patients with a low clinical pretest probability of pulmonary embolism and a d -dimer level of less than 1000 ng per milliliter (twice the usual threshold used to rule out the disorder), the need for diagnostic imaging was reduced from 51.9% to 34.3% of patients, without increasing the risk of missing the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1909159