Management of patients with mitral regurgitation ineligible for standard therapy undergoing TMVI screening

Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) represents a novel treatment alternative for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) considered ineligible for standard therapies. Data on the management of patients after TMVI screening are scarce. We aimed to investigate outcomes of patients wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuroIntervention Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 213 - 223
Main Authors Ludwig, Sebastian, Sedighian, Roya, Weimann, Jessica, Koell, Benedikt, Waldschmidt, Lara, Schäfer, Andreas, Seiffert, Moritz, Westermann, Dirk, Reichenspurner, Hermann, Blankenberg, Stefan, Schofer, Niklas, Lubos, Edith, Conradi, Lenard, Kalbacher, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published France Europa Edition 24.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) represents a novel treatment alternative for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) considered ineligible for standard therapies. Data on the management of patients after TMVI screening are scarce. We aimed to investigate outcomes of patients with severe MR undergoing TMVI evaluation treated with either TMVI, bailout-transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (bailout-TEER) or medical therapy (MT). Between May 2016 and February 2021, 121 patients with MR considered ineligible for standard therapy were screened for TMVI. Outcomes were assessed for the subgroups of patients treated with TMVI, bailout-TEER and MT. The primary composite endpoint was all-cause death or heart failure hospitalisation after one year. The subgroups of TMVI (N=38), bailout-TEER (N=28) and MT (N=44) differed significantly with regard to MR aetiology (secondary MR: TMVI 68.4%, bailout-TEER 39.3%, MT 38.6%, p=0.014) and left ventricular ejection fraction (TMVI 37.0% [31.4-51.2], bailout-TEER 48.0% [35.3-58.3], MT 54.5% [40.8-60.0], p<0.001). At discharge and after one year, MR was reduced to ≤mild residual MR in all patients undergoing TMVI, while ≥moderate residual MR was present in 25.9% and 20.0% of patients, respectively, after bailout-TEER, and in 100.0% of patients on MT at one year. The primary endpoint occurred in 72.2% of patients remaining on MT, in 51.6% of patients undergoing TMVI and in 40.2% of those receiving bailout-TEER. In MR patients considered ineligible for standard therapy, TMVI provided acceptable clinical outcomes and MR elimination in the majority of patients. In screen-failed patients, bailout-TEER represented a reasonable alternative while MT was associated with poor outcomes.
ISSN:1774-024X
1969-6213
DOI:10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00708