Porcelain stoneware with pegmatite and nepheline syenite solid solutions: Pore size distribution and descriptive microstructure

Investigations correlating the pore size distribution-cumulative pore volume to the microstructure are used to compare the efficiency of two solid solutions of pegmatite and nepheline syenite as fluxing agents for the design of porcelainized stoneware. Particularly the fusibility of the two solid so...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the European Ceramic Society Vol. 33; no. 13-14; pp. 2775 - 2784
Main Authors Kamseu, E., Bakop, T., Djangang, C., Melo, U.C., Hanuskova, M., Leonelli, C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Investigations correlating the pore size distribution-cumulative pore volume to the microstructure are used to compare the efficiency of two solid solutions of pegmatite and nepheline syenite as fluxing agents for the design of porcelainized stoneware. Particularly the fusibility of the two solid solutions was modified by adjusting the CaO content of the bodies. As results, the pegmatite based flux produced an extended viscous phase capable on embedding the crystalline phases and close open porosity as from 1175°C. Conversely, the bodies with nepheline syenite remained relatively porous up to 1225°C although the similar results of the mechanical strength at this temperature. The investigations on microstructure, pores size distribution and cumulative pore volume indicated almost complete reduction of the open pores in the pegmatite based bodies and the development of a band of closed pores ranged between 0.080 and 0.9μm showing P series as a more compact structure. For the nepheline syenite based bodies, the incomplete reduction of the open pores and the relative absence of the band of pores between 0.080 and 0.9μm were ascribed to the difference in fusibility and the viscosity of the glassy phases. These differences were interpreted in term of the differential action of CaO in Na2O–Al2O3–SiO2 and K2O–Al2O3–SiO2 on the amount and viscosity of the liquid phase formed already described in the literature.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0955-2219
1873-619X
DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.03.028