Preclinical studies with the photon radiosurgery system (PRS)

• Published in: International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 47; no. 3; pp. 809 - 813
• Main Authors: Astor, Myles B, Hilaris, Basil S, Gruerio, Anthony, Varricchione, Thomas, Smith, Don
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.06.2000; Elsevier
• Subjects: Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Biological effects of radiation; Cell Survival; CHO Cells - radiation effects; Cricetinae; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Glioblastoma; Humans; Ionizing radiations; Linear Energy Transfer; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Photons - therapeutic use; Radiosurgery; Radiosurgery - instrumentation; Radiosurgery - methods; Radiotherapy; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects); RBE; Relative Biological Effectiveness; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics; Tumor Cells, Cultured - radiation effects; Tumors; X-rays; RBE; Radiotherapy; X-rays; Radiosurgery; Tumors; Biological properties; Cell culture; Evaluation; Animal model; Treatment efficiency; Rodentia; Experimental study; X ray irradiation; Photon; Physical properties; Low energy; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Radiobiology; Animal; Dosimetry; Hamster
• ISSN: 0360-3016; 1879-355X
• DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)00472-7

Purpose: Determine the radiobiological effectiveness (RBE) for low-energy X-rays (average energy of 23 KeV) produced by the Photon Radiosurgery System (PRS). Methods and Materials: RBE values were assessed by comparison with survival data obtained for cells irradiated with either low-energy X-rays from a GE Maxitron 100 machine or high-energy photons from a clinically used Varian 6 MV LINAC. The output of the GE and PRS sources was determined using Baldwin-Farmer and Markus thin window ionization chambers calibrated with 50 kVp X-rays and cross-checked against figures supplied by Photoelectron Corporation. The dose-rate for the PRS was 1.2 Gy/min at a distance of 35 mm with a field flatness of ±2%. Results: The RBE for the PRS low-energy X-ray source (at 1-mm depth) was greater than either the GE or Varian machines and varied with cell survival. For Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, the PRS was 1.25 and 3.3 times more effective than 90 kVp X-rays and 6 MeV photons at 0.5% cell survival, respectively; by comparison, the PRS was 1.2 and 1.9 times more effective at 0.05% cell survival, respectively. Similar RBE values of 1.4 and 1.2 were obtained for human U373 and T98 glioblastoma cells grown in vitro irradiated with the PRS or GE sources, respectively. Other studies showed that the RBE for the PRS low-energy X-ray source increased with depth. The RBEs for the PRS source at 1-mm and 4-mm depth were 1.2 and 2.5 (0.5% survival) and 1.2 and 1.9 (0.05% survival). Conclusions: The biological and physical properties of the PRS low-energy X-rays offer, under the right conditions, a significant advantage for patient treatment over conventional external beam, stereotactic, or brachytherapy treatment.