Randomised clinical trial: arbaclofen placarbil in gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease – insights into study design for transient lower sphincter relaxation inhibitors
Summary Background Arbaclofen placarbil is a pro‐drug of the gamma‐aminobutyric acid‐B agonist R‐baclofen that has been shown to reduce reflux episodes in patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of arbaclofen placarbil vs. placebo as adjunctive...
Saved in:
Published in | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics Vol. 38; no. 2; pp. 107 - 117 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell
01.07.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Summary
Background
Arbaclofen placarbil is a pro‐drug of the gamma‐aminobutyric acid‐B agonist R‐baclofen that has been shown to reduce reflux episodes in patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Aim
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of arbaclofen placarbil vs. placebo as adjunctive therapy in subjects with troublesome GERD symptoms despite therapy with once‐daily doses of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and to identify the characteristics of patients who were responders.
Methods
Patients (n = 460) with symptomatic GERD experiencing troublesome symptoms on once‐daily PPI therapy were enrolled in this phase II, randomised, multicentre, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, dose‐ranging study. Patients were randomised to receive placebo or arbaclofen placarbil (20 or 40 mg once daily, 20 or 30 mg twice daily) with their current PPI for 6 weeks. Patients recorded heartburn and other GERD symptoms in a daily diary and rated severity of each event. The primary endpoint was percent change from baseline in heartburn events per week.
Results
In the primary analysis, there was no significant difference between arbaclofen placarbil and placebo. Post hoc analyses removing mild and very mild heartburn events resulted in greater percent reductions for all arbaclofen placarbil doses with nominal P values <0.05 for each dose compared with placebo. There was a dose‐related increase for the most common adverse events.
Conclusions
Arbaclofen placarbil was not superior to placebo in the primary analysis. Post hoc analyses suggest that subjects with more clinically relevant moderate or severe symptoms are more likely to respond to arbaclofen placarbil (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00978016). |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 ObjectType-News-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0269-2813 1365-2036 |
DOI: | 10.1111/apt.12363 |