Transbuccal sonographic evaluation of the local extent of tumors of the tongue with pathological correlation

ABSTRACT Purpose The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative transbuccal ultrasound (US) for the evaluation of tongue tumors. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between preoperative US measurements and postoperative pathologic measurements of tongue tumor size. Methods Fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical ultrasound Vol. 43; no. 7; pp. 412 - 416
Main Authors Choi, Hyo Geun, Jeon, Eui-Yong, Won, Joong Yeon, Kim, Jin-Hwan, Lee, Gwanseop, Kim, Si-whan, Park, Bumjung
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.09.2015
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT Purpose The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative transbuccal ultrasound (US) for the evaluation of tongue tumors. Thus, we evaluated the correlation between preoperative US measurements and postoperative pathologic measurements of tongue tumor size. Methods From January 2003 to March 2011, 29 patients with tongue tumors were evaluated. All patients underwent preoperative transbuccal US at 1 day before surgery. Preoperative US was compared with pathology findings, including specimen size. The maximum anterior‐posterior (AP) diameter of the long axis of the tumor, the maximum width (WD), and the maximum thickness (TH) of the tumor were measured with US along with a pathologic evaluation of the specimens. Results The mean AP was 22 ± 1 mm; WD was 13 ± 6 mm, and TH was 10 ± 5 mm using US. The pathologic mean AP was 21 ± 12 mm; WD was 12 ± 6 mm, and TH was 9 ± 4 mm. The Spearman's correlation coefficients of the AP, WD, and TH were 0.905 (p < 0.001), 0.918 (p < 0.001), and 0.971 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions Transbuccal US is a useful tool for predicting tongue tumor extent. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 43:412–416, 2015
Bibliography:ArticleID:JCU22251
istex:47B23CEC46075EEEC1DAA24B540E564234B15F36
ark:/67375/WNG-MD0MK5VZ-0
These authors contributed equally to this article.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0091-2751
1097-0096
DOI:10.1002/jcu.22251