Low-cost solar PV soiling sensor validation and size resolved soiling impacts: A comprehensive field study in Western India

[Display omitted] •Soiling rates were 0.37% day−1 equating to ~12 million US$ per year loss in Gujarat.•A low-cost digital microscope system can estimate soiling loss within 1%•Size resolved soiling estimates reveal particles < 5 µm account for >50% of losses.•~5% loss per g m−2 deposited PM,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSolar energy Vol. 204; pp. 307 - 315
Main Authors Valerino, Michael, Bergin, Mike, Ghoroi, Chinmay, Ratnaparkhi, Aniket, Smestad, Greg P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2020
Pergamon Press Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Soiling rates were 0.37% day−1 equating to ~12 million US$ per year loss in Gujarat.•A low-cost digital microscope system can estimate soiling loss within 1%•Size resolved soiling estimates reveal particles < 5 µm account for >50% of losses.•~5% loss per g m−2 deposited PM, where 90% of mass was from particles > 10 µm.•Light rain and high humidity lead to 2x soiling rate and 5-10x deposition velocity. Deposition of particulate matter (PM) onto solar photovoltaic (PV) panels - known as soiling - has been estimated to reduce energy production by 10–40% in many regions of the world. Despite this, many key properties including soiling rates, PM source contributions, physical and optical properties of the deposited particles, and the impact of rain and relative humidity (RH) are not well understood. With this in mind we conducted a field study in Gandhinagar, India. Our approach combines soiling monitoring with a reference station and a low-cost digital microscopy system, sample collection for mass loading information, glass sample slides for size resolved soiling impacts, and monitoring of rain, RH, and panel temperature for insight into meteorological impacts on cleaning and soiling rates. Results indicate soiling reduces PV energy production by 0.37 ± 0.09% day−1. The low cost (<100$) digital microscope estimated soiling within ~1% of measured losses, confirming the feasibility of this low-cost alternative to expensive soiling stations. Deposited PM decreased energy production by 5.12 ± 0.55% per PM mass loading (g m−2). Microscopy analyses of field samples revealed that > 90% of deposited mass loading is from particles > 5 µm in diameter, with > 50% of the soiling impacts estimated to be from particles < 5 µm. While heavy rain cleaned PV panels, light rains and high RH contributed to a 2x soiling rate and 5-10x PM deposition velocities as compared to dry periods.
ISSN:0038-092X
1471-1257
DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.118