Timolol gel versus acetazolamide in the prophylaxis of ocular hypertension after phacoemulsification

Purpose: To compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after administration of acetazolamide and timolol following phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Setting: Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, USA. Methods: Sixty patients were included in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cataract and refractive surgery Vol. 23; no. 7; pp. 1070 - 1074
Main Authors Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John, Perry, Henry D., Donnenfeld, Eric D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01.09.1997
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose: To compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) after administration of acetazolamide and timolol following phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Setting: Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Rockville Centre, New York, USA. Methods: Sixty patients were included in a prospective, randomized, masked trial. The patients received either two doses of oral, sustained-release acetazolamide (Diamox® Sequels®) or a single dose of topical timolol 0.5% gel (Timoptic XE®). Intraocular pressure was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry preoperatively and 1 day postoperatively. Results: Mean preoperative IOP was 16.4 mm Hg. One day postoperatively, it was 19.5 mm Hg in the oral acetazolamide group and 15.9 mm Hg in the timolol gel group. One patient in the acetazolamide group developed significant adverse reactions. Conclusion: Prophylactic use of topical timolol 0.5% gel for viscoelastic-induced ocular hypertension after cataract extraction appears to offer better IOP control than oral acetazolamide and has potentially fewer adverse systemic effects.
ISSN:0886-3350
1873-4502
DOI:10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80082-X