How genotype influences the egg quality in the second half of laying cycle?

The objective of this study was to determine and compare egg quality from two genotypes of brown egg-laying hens in the second half of laying cycle (from 46 to 74 weeks of age). Commercial hybrids Hisex Brown and Lohmann Brown Classic were used in this study. Both genotypes were kept in enriched cag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Central European Agriculture Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 215 - 221
Main Authors Kraus, Adam, Zita, Lukáš, Krunt, Ondřej, Pokorná, Kamila
Format Journal Article Paper
LanguageEnglish
Published Agronomski fakultet Zagreb 01.01.2020
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objective of this study was to determine and compare egg quality from two genotypes of brown egg-laying hens in the second half of laying cycle (from 46 to 74 weeks of age). Commercial hybrids Hisex Brown and Lohmann Brown Classic were used in this study. Both genotypes were kept in enriched cages. 1920 eggs were evaluated. The significant effect of genotype was found in all evaluated traits except for the eggshell proportion and reflectivity. Results show that eggs from Lohmann Brown Classic hens had a superior quality in majority of the evaluated traits. Higher values were observed in main egg quality traits, such as egg weight (by 1.45 g, P≤0.0001), eggshell strength (by 2.48 N*cm-2, P≤0.0005) and Haugh units (by 3.27, P≤0.0001). The significant effect of age was determined in all selected egg quality traits. The egg weight increased with the age, meanwhile other traits such as egg shape, albumen and yolk index, Haugh units and eggshell strength decreased. The trend of the rest of evaluated traits was ambiguous. Furthermore, the interactions between genotype and age were determined. Regarding the extension of laying cycle, further research is required, because the egg quality rapidly decreases with the age.
Bibliography:239312
ISSN:1332-9049
1332-9049
DOI:10.5513/JCEA01/21.2.2683