Developmental and evolutionary comparative analysis of a regulatory landscape in mouse and chicken

Modifications in gene regulation are driving forces in the evolution of organisms. Part of these changes involve cis-regulatory elements (CREs), which contact their target genes through higher-order chromatin structures. However, how such architectures and variations in CREs contribute to transcript...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDevelopment (Cambridge) Vol. 149; no. 12
Main Authors Hintermann, Aurélie, Guerreiro, Isabel, Lopez-Delisle, Lucille, Bolt, Christopher Chase, Gitto, Sandra, Duboule, Denis, Beccari, Leonardo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The Company of Biologists Ltd 15.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Modifications in gene regulation are driving forces in the evolution of organisms. Part of these changes involve cis-regulatory elements (CREs), which contact their target genes through higher-order chromatin structures. However, how such architectures and variations in CREs contribute to transcriptional evolvability remains elusive. We use Hoxd genes as a paradigm for the emergence of regulatory innovations, as many relevant enhancers are located in a regulatory landscape highly conserved in amniotes. Here, we analysed their regulation in murine vibrissae and chicken feather primordia, two skin appendages expressing different Hoxd gene subsets, and compared the regulation of these genes in these appendages with that in the elongation of the posterior trunk. In the two former structures, distinct subsets of Hoxd genes are contacted by different lineage-specific enhancers, probably as a result of using an ancestral chromatin topology as an evolutionary playground, whereas the gene regulation that occurs in the mouse and chicken embryonic trunk partially relies on conserved CREs. A high proportion of these non-coding sequences active in the trunk have functionally diverged between species, suggesting that transcriptional robustness is maintained, despite considerable divergence in enhancer sequences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Present address: Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
These authors contributed equally to this work
Handling Editor: Benoit Bruneau
Present address: Institut Neuromyogène. CNRS UMR 5310, INSERM U1217, University of Lyon, 69008 Lyon, France.
ISSN:0950-1991
1477-9129
DOI:10.1242/dev.200594