Outcomes of Elective and Emergency Conversion in Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study

• Published in: Annals of surgery Vol. 274; no. 6; p. e1001
• Main Authors: Lof, Sanne, Korrel, Maarten, van Hilst, Jony, Moekotte, Alma L, Bassi, Claudio, Butturini, Giovanni, Boggi, Ugo, Dokmak, Safi, Edwin, Bjørn, Falconi, Massimo, Fuks, David, de Pastena, Matteo, Zerbi, Alessandro, Besselink, Marc G, Abu Hilal, Mohammed
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.12.2021
• Subjects: Aged; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal - surgery; Conversion to Open Surgery - statistics & numerical data; Female; Humans; Male; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data; Pancreatectomy - methods; Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery; Propensity Score; Recovery of Function
• ISSN: 1528-1140
• DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003717

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of conversion during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on outcome by a propensity-matched comparison with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). MIDP is associated with faster recovery as compared with ODP. The high conversion rate (15%-25%) in patients with PDAC, however, is worrisome and may negatively influence outcome. A post hoc analysis of a retrospective cohort including distal pancreatectomies for PDAC from 34 centers in 11 countries. Patients requiring conversion were matched, using propensity scores, to ODP procedures (1:2 ratio). Indications for conversion were classified as elective conversions (eg, vascular involvement) or emergency conversions (eg, bleeding). Among 1212 distal pancreatectomies for PDAC, 345 patients underwent MIDP, with 68 (19.7%) conversions, mostly elective (n = 46, 67.6%). Vascular resection (other than splenic vessels) was required in 19.1% of the converted procedures. After matching (61 MIDP-converted vs 122 ODP), conversion did not affect R-status, recurrence of cancer, nor overall survival. However, emergency conversion was associated with increased overall morbidity (61.9% vs 31.1%, P= 0.007) and a trend to worse oncological outcome compared with ODP. Elective conversion was associated with comparable overall morbidity. Elective conversion in MIDP for PDAC was associated with comparable short-term and oncological outcomes in comparison with ODP. However, emergency conversions were associated with worse both short- and long-term outcomes, and should be prevented by careful patient selection, awareness of surgeons' learning curve, and consideration of early conversion when unexpected intraoperative findings are encountered.