Angular disparity in ETACT scintimammography

• Published in: Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 29; no. 9; p. 1980
• Main Authors: Fahey, Frederic H, Rhyasen, Kerry L, Harkness, Beth A, Meltsner, Michael A, Webber, Richard L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.09.2002
• Subjects: Breast - diagnostic imaging; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Computer Simulation; Humans; Image Enhancement - instrumentation; Image Enhancement - methods; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Quality Control; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, Emission-Computed - instrumentation; Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods
• ISSN: 0094-2405
• DOI: 10.1118/1.1500396

Emission tuned aperture computed tomography (ETACT) has been previously shown to have the potential for the detection of small tumors (<1 cm) in scintimammography. However, the optimal approach to the application of ETACT in the clinic has yet to be determined. Therefore, we sought to determine the effect of the angular disparity between the ETACT projections on image quality through the use of a computer simulation. A small, spherical tumor of variable size (5, 7.5 or 10 mm) was placed at the center of a hemispherical breast (15 cm diameter). The tumor to nontumor ratio was either 5:1 or 10:1. The detector was modeled to be a gamma camera fitted with a 4-mm-diam pinhole collimator. The pinhole-to-detector and the pinhole-to-tumor distances were 25 and 15 cm, respectively. A ray tracing technique was used to generate three sets of projections (10 degrees, 15 degrees, and 20 degrees, angular disparity). These data were blurred to a resolution consistent with the 4 mm pinhole. The TACT reconstruction method was used to reconstruct these three image sets. The tumor contrast and the axial spatial resolution was measured. Smaller angular disparity led to an improvement in image contrast but at a cost of degraded axial spatial resolution. The improvement in contrast is due to a slight improvement in the in-plane spatial resolution. Since improved contrast should lead to better tumor detectability, smaller angular disparity should be used. However, the difference in contrast between 10 degrees and 15 degrees was very slight and therefore a reasonable clinical choice for angular disparity is 15 degrees.