Participation and wellbeing in urban greenspace: ‘curating sociability’ for refugees and asylum seekers

• Published in: Geoforum Vol. 106; pp. 125 - 134
• Main Authors: Rishbeth, Clare, Blachnicka-Ciacek, Dominika, Darling, Jonathan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2019; Elsevier Science Ltd
• Subjects: Cities; Cultural capital; Egalitarianism; Expenditures; Integrated care; Integration; Job insecurity; Legal status; Legibility; Migration; Multiculturalism & pluralism; Nature; Open spaces; Parks; Parks & recreation areas; Participation; Political asylum; Public opinion; Refugees; Relocation; Resettlement; Safety; Sociability; Support services; Urban areas; Urban planning; Venture capital; Well being; Nature; Integration; Safety; Cities; Parks; Migration
• ISSN: 0016-7185; 1872-9398
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.014

•Urban greenspaces can be sites of respite and risk for asylum seekers and refugees.•Access to urban greenspace is often ignored in debates over refugee integration.•Outdoor activities can have positive wellbeing effects for new arrivals in a city.•Barriers of isolation, language and cultural competency inhibit urban greenspace use.•Facilitated interventions are key to fostering engagement with urban greenspaces. This paper examines how asylum seekers and refugees experience urban greenspaces. Whilst often overlooked in a focus on support services and integration, we argue that critically exploring the importance of urban greenspaces has wider implications for understanding how asylum seekers and refugees navigate experiences of displacement and resettlement. Drawing on empirical work foregrounding refugee experiences in Berlin, London, and Sheffield, we found that spending time outdoors in local recreational spaces such as parks, can have positive outcomes for wellbeing and inclusion, with the potential to support respite and the beginnings of belonging. However, though there were multiple positive accounts, especially of busier parks and of appreciating nature, many participants were uncertain or anxious about using parks. The interviews highlight the multiple barriers faced by asylum seekers and refugees, regarding information, legibility and in gaining the cultural capital and confidence needed venture out. The varied experiences reflect the diversity of greenspace typologies in Northern European cities, and also how individuals weight up public perceptions and, for some, the insecurity of their legal status. In unpacking the interaction between these barriers, we define and propose ‘curated sociability’ approaches as possible frameworks for supporting egalitarian participation and offering pathways to greater engagement. We conclude by highlighting a range of interventions that offer situated opportunities for asylum seekers and refugees to engage with urban greenspaces, and which provide insights into how the expectations and rules of urban greenspace are actively negotiated and may be rewritten.