Protein Hydrolysates Derived from Animals and Plants—A Review of Production Methods and Antioxidant Activity

There is currently considerable interest on the use of animal, plant, and fungal sources in the production of bioactive peptides, as evidenced by the substantial body of research on the topic. Such sources provide cheap and environmentally friendly material as it often includes waste and by-products...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFoods Vol. 11; no. 13; p. 1953
Main Authors Czelej, Michał, Garbacz, Katarzyna, Czernecki, Tomasz, Wawrzykowski, Jacek, Waśko, Adam
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 30.06.2022
MDPI
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is currently considerable interest on the use of animal, plant, and fungal sources in the production of bioactive peptides, as evidenced by the substantial body of research on the topic. Such sources provide cheap and environmentally friendly material as it often includes waste and by-products. Enzymatic hydrolysis is considered an efficient method of obtaining peptides capable of antioxidant activity. Those properties have been proven in terms of radical-scavenging capacity using the DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS (2,2-azinobis-(3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid)), hydroxyl and superoxide radical methods. Additionally, the reducing power, ferrous ion-chelating (FIC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and the ability of the protein hydrolysates to inhibit lipid peroxidation have also been explored. The results collected in this review clearly indicate that the substrate properties, as well as the conditions under which the hydrolysis reaction is carried out, affect the final antioxidant potential of the obtained peptides. This is mainly due to the structural properties of the obtained compounds such as size or amino acid sequences.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2304-8158
2304-8158
DOI:10.3390/foods11131953