Freezing effects and objects

• Published in: Journal of linguistics Vol. 47; no. 1; pp. 163 - 250
• Main Author: LOHNDAL, TERJE
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Cambridge University Press 01.03.2011
• Subjects: Applicative theories; Argument structure; Checkable deposits; Comparative analysis; Comparative Linguistics; Descriptive studies and applied theories; English; English language; Freezing; Gift giving; Grammar; Grammatical agreement; Grammatical constructions; Language; Language use; Languages; Linguistics; Nominative case; Norwegian; Norwegian language; Syntactic Analysis; Syntactic Structures; Syntax; Verbs; Word order; Syntactic island; Indirect object; English; Syntactic position; Generative syntax; Comparative analysis; Syntax; Norwegian; Grammatical subject
• ISSN: 0022-2267; 1469-7742
• DOI: 10.1017/S0022226710000010

This paper is an investigation of freezing effects, that is, cases where an element (e.g. an object or a subject, or an element within it) is unable to move from a certain structural position. An account of the most prominent properties of freezing in Norwegian is followed by a comparative study of primarily English and Norwegian indirect objects, with important consequences for the general approach to indirect objects. Although recent analyses capture central properties of indirect objects, they fall short of accounting for freezing properties, seen here in terms of agreement properties, most notably Case agreement. It is shown that both subjects and indirect objects disallow sub-extraction in both English and Norwegian; however, unlike English, Norwegian allows the indirect object to Á-bar move. This relates to the question of whether Case is structural or inherent. As such, this paper offers a new argument in favor of Case as a central ingredient in deriving freezing effects.