Short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients  ≥ 85 years old: a multicenter study using a propensity score-matched analysis

Purpose The number of laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients has been increasing. We examined the short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients (≥ 85 years old) compared with the outcomes in younger patients (< 85 years old). M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSurgery today (Tokyo, Japan) Vol. 52; no. 9; pp. 1292 - 1298
Main Authors Hashimoto, Shintaro, Tominaga, Tetsuro, Nonaka, Takashi, To, Kazuo, Wada, Hideo, Takeshita, Hiroaki, Fukuoka, Hidetoshi, Araki, Masato, Tanaka, Kenji, Sawai, Terumitsu, Nagayasu, Takeshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore Springer Nature Singapore 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose The number of laparoscopic surgeries for colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients has been increasing. We examined the short- and mid-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients (≥ 85 years old) compared with the outcomes in younger patients (< 85 years old). Methods We retrospectively reviewed primary tumor resection for CRC from April 2015 to December 2020 at six hospitals. Short- and mid-term outcomes were compared after propensity score matching. Results From the 1374 patients, 126 matched pairs were selected. In the matched cohort, the duration of postoperative hospital stay was longer in the oldest-old patients than in the younger patients (15 days vs. 12 days, p  = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in the rate of Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ 2 postoperative complications (21.4% vs. 15.1%, p  = 0.254). The oldest-old patients showed a poorer overall survival (OS) than the younger patients (3-year OS, 79.9% vs. 93.5%, p  = 0.005) but comparable recurrence-free survival (RFS) (3-year RFS, 72.2% vs. 81.6%, p  = 0.530) and cancer-specific survival rates (CSS) (3-year CSS, 90.1% vs. 99.0%, p  = 0.124). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery for CRC in oldest-old patients was performed safely with comparable short-term outcomes to those in younger patients. Although the OS was poorer in the oldest-old patients than in the younger patients, the oncological mid-term outcomes were comparable. Laparoscopic surgery for CRC can be considered acceptable as a treatment in oldest-old patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0941-1291
1436-2813
DOI:10.1007/s00595-022-02468-w