Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment
The development of ‘age-friendly cities’ has become a major area of work in the field of ageing and the built environment. This movement is driven by the observation that cities are home to an ever-increasing ageing population. Over the past decade, a multitude of age-friendly initiatives have been...
Saved in:
Published in | Building and environment Vol. 199; p. 107922 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier Ltd
15.07.2021
Elsevier BV |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The development of ‘age-friendly cities’ has become a major area of work in the field of ageing and the built environment. This movement is driven by the observation that cities are home to an ever-increasing ageing population. Over the past decade, a multitude of age-friendly initiatives have been developed with the aim of making physical and social environments more favourable for older people's well-being, health and ability to live in the community. This article explores ten key questions associated with the age-friendly cities and communities' movement, with a particular focus on the built environment. It provides an overview of the history of the age-friendly cities' movement and the underlying models, the aspects of the built environment that are relevant for age-friendly cities, the ways age-friendliness can be evaluated, and the interactions between age-friendly cities initiatives and other strategic agendas such as smart cities. The paper concludes by discussing future perspectives and possible directions for further development of the age-friendly movement.
•This article explores ten questions on age-friendly cities focusing on the built environment.•The paper provides an overview of age-friendly assessment tools.•On a global scale, an overhauled model of age-friendly cities is needed.•A discussion of future perspectives of the age-friendly movement is provided.•Overlooking the digitalisation of society has been a missed opportunity for age-friendliness. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0360-1323 1873-684X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922 |