Ten questions concerning age-friendly cities and communities and the built environment

The development of ‘age-friendly cities’ has become a major area of work in the field of ageing and the built environment. This movement is driven by the observation that cities are home to an ever-increasing ageing population. Over the past decade, a multitude of age-friendly initiatives have been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBuilding and environment Vol. 199; p. 107922
Main Authors van Hoof, J., Marston, H.R., Kazak, J.K., Buffel, T.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 15.07.2021
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The development of ‘age-friendly cities’ has become a major area of work in the field of ageing and the built environment. This movement is driven by the observation that cities are home to an ever-increasing ageing population. Over the past decade, a multitude of age-friendly initiatives have been developed with the aim of making physical and social environments more favourable for older people's well-being, health and ability to live in the community. This article explores ten key questions associated with the age-friendly cities and communities' movement, with a particular focus on the built environment. It provides an overview of the history of the age-friendly cities' movement and the underlying models, the aspects of the built environment that are relevant for age-friendly cities, the ways age-friendliness can be evaluated, and the interactions between age-friendly cities initiatives and other strategic agendas such as smart cities. The paper concludes by discussing future perspectives and possible directions for further development of the age-friendly movement. •This article explores ten questions on age-friendly cities focusing on the built environment.•The paper provides an overview of age-friendly assessment tools.•On a global scale, an overhauled model of age-friendly cities is needed.•A discussion of future perspectives of the age-friendly movement is provided.•Overlooking the digitalisation of society has been a missed opportunity for age-friendliness.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0360-1323
1873-684X
DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922