Urease Inhibitors Effects on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency in a Maize–Wheat Rotation with or without Water Deficit

• Published in: Agriculture (Basel) Vol. 11; no. 7; p. 684
• Main Authors: Allende-Montalbán, Raúl, Martín-Lammerding, Diana, Delgado, María del Mar, Porcel, Miguel A., Gabriel, José L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.07.2021
• Subjects: Agricultural practices; Agricultural production; Ammonia; ammonia volatilization; Ammonium; Arid regions; Availability; Climate adaptation; Climate change; Corn; Crop rotation; Crops; Economic impact; Economics; Efficiency; Enzymes; Experiments; fertilizer management; Fertilizers; Impact analysis; Inhibitors; Irrigation; Irrigation systems; Leaching; nitrate leaching; Nitrates; Nitrogen; Semi arid areas; Semiarid lands; sustainable cropping systems; Urea; Urease; Volatilization; Water availability; Water deficit; Water shortages; Wheat; Spain
• ISSN: 2077-0472; 2077-0472
• DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11070684

The use of urease inhibitors in irrigated systems decreases both soil ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3−) availability, and, thus, could be an easy tool to reduce N loss due to ammonia volatilization and NO3− leaching. The main goal of this experiment was to assess the effect of urease inhibitors on N use efficiency, N losses, and their economic impact in a maize-wheat field experiment. In this study, 10 treatments were compared, combining the urea fertilizer with or without urease inhibitor, applied in one or two dressings, and under optimal or sub-optimal irrigation. A single application of urease inhibitor (IN1d), coupled with the conventional urea, helped to reduce the nitrate leaching risk both during the maize period (even when compared to the two dressing treatment) and after harvest. In addition, this improvement was achieved together with an increase in economic benefit, even when compared with the application of the same amount of regular urea split into two dressings. Under low water availability systems, the benefits of applying urease inhibitors increased with respect to the application of regular urea, making this technique a very promising strategy for adaptation to climate change in arid and semiarid regions.