Estimations of Mutation Rates Depend on Population Allele Frequency Distribution: The Case of Autosomal Microsatellites

• Published in: Genes Vol. 13; no. 7; p. 1248
• Main Authors: Antão-Sousa, Sofia, Conde-Sousa, Eduardo, Gusmão, Leonor, Amorim, António, Pinto, Nádia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 14.07.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Algorithms; Alleles; autosomes; Bias; dating; Estimates; Frequency distribution; Gene frequency; Gene polymorphism; Genetic markers; hidden mutations; Informatics; Microsatellites; Mutation; mutation rate estimates biases; Mutation rates; Population; Population genetics; Short tandem repeats; STRs; Somalia; Norway; Spain
• ISSN: 2073-4425; 2073-4425
• DOI: 10.3390/genes13071248

Microsatellites (or short-tandem repeats (STRs)) are widely used in anthropology and evolutionary studies. Their extensive polymorphism and rapid evolution make them the ideal genetic marker for dating events, such as the age of a gene or a population. This usage requires the estimation of mutation rates, which are usually estimated by counting the observed Mendelian incompatibilities in one-generation familial configurations (typically parent(s)–child duos or trios). Underestimations are inevitable when using this approach, due to the occurrence of mutational events that do not lead to incompatibilities with the parental genotypes (‘hidden’ or ‘covert’ mutations). It is known that the likelihood that one mutation event leads to a Mendelian incompatibility depends on the mode of genetic transmission considered, the type of familial configuration (duos or trios) considered, and the genotype(s) of the progenitor(s). In this work, we show how the magnitude of the underestimation of autosomal microsatellite mutation rates varies with the populations’ allele frequency distribution spectrum. The Mendelian incompatibilities approach (MIA) was applied to simulated parent(s)/offspring duos and trios in different populational scenarios. The results showed that the magnitude and type of biases depend on the population allele frequency distribution, whatever the type of familial data considered, and are greater when duos, instead of trios, are used to obtain the estimates. The implications for molecular anthropology are discussed and a simple framework is presented to correct the naïf estimates, along with an informatics tool for the correction of incompatibility rates obtained through the MIA.