Ideological Presuppositions in Media Coverage of Corporation Tax Policy in the UK and Ireland: A Critical Discourse Analysis

• Published in: The American behavioral scientist (Beverly Hills) Vol. 68; no. 14; pp. 1862 - 1893
• Main Authors: Graham, Ciara, O’Rourke, Brendan K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.12.2024; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Argument structure; Assets; Capital; Case studies; Companies; Comparative analysis; Corporate taxes; Crises; Critical discourse analysis; Critical theory; death; Deregulation; Discourse analysis; Discourse structure; Discourses; Free trade; Globalization; Ideology; industry; Ireland; Liberalization; Mass media; Media coverage; Multinational corporations; Non-state actors; Presuppositions; Research design; scientists; Supply; Tax avoidance; Taxation; taxes; Trade liberalization; Ireland; crises; CDA; corporation tax; temporality; discourse
• ISSN: 0002-7642; 1552-3381; 1552-3381
• DOI: 10.1177/00027642221144830

This paper argues that the state’s capacity to tax corporations in order to fund itself is reaching crisis proportions. Following decades of trade liberalization, deregulation, and globalization, large multinational companies have been able to take advantage of tax competition between states in order to avoid taxation and offset their obligations. This crisis, arguably, has been facilitated by state actors and exacerbated by non-state actors: we explore the ways in which multi-national corporations (MNCs) manipulate their capital, assets, and supply chains to minimize their tax burdens; and we further consider the ways in which media narratives construct this issue and whether they challenge the practice or intensify it. Discourse surrounding taxation plays a huge part in what is considered acceptable. While the old adage that “death and taxes” cannot be avoided, it has become clear that large companies, helped by a tax avoidance industry do indeed manage to do just that. Discourse analysis reveals the ways in which ideology can be used to manage consensus around this potentially controversial subject and this paper seeks to explicate that by examining the frames, presuppositions and discursive formations present within the discourse structure. The argument is developed through a comparative case study research design demonstrating the different policy-based, economic and historical contexts of the two jurisdictions which offer some insight and explanation of the distinctive ideological discursive formations that are present within the discourses.