A systematic map of cassava farming practices and their agricultural and environmental impacts using new ontologies: Agri‐ontologies 1.0

• Published in: Ecological solutions and evidence Vol. 4; no. 2
• Main Authors: Hood, Amelia S. C., Shackelford, Gorm E., Christie, Alec P., Usieta, Hope O., Martin, Philip A., Sutherland, William J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Wiley 01.04.2023
• Subjects: agricultural taxonomy; cassava Manihot esculenta; evidence‐based management; interactive evidence map; reporting standards; standardised classification system; subject‐wide evidence synthesis; sustainable agriculture; systematic map; terminological ontology agriculture
• ISSN: 2688-8319; 2688-8319
• DOI: 10.1002/2688-8319.12249

Cassava is consumed by 800 million people and is a staple crop in Africa. Its production may increase under climate change due to its high drought tolerance. We produced a systematic map of scientific studies about cassava farming practices, with the aim of identifying knowledge gaps and clusters. Our secondary aim was to develop a classification system for [1] farming interventions and [2] agricultural, economic and environmental outcomes. Standardised classification systems facilitate data reuse, including for evidence synthesis, and promote research efficiency. Following our published protocol, we searched eight publication databases using the search string ‘cassava OR mandioca OR manihot OR manioc OR yuca’ in December 2017. We screened 36,580 records and included publications that measured the impact of cassava farming practices on agricultural, economic or environmental outcomes, including yield, soil, water, wildlife and labour. We classified the resultant 1599 publications by interventions, outcomes, location, study year and study design. We assessed coding consistency using Kappa scores. We found regional knowledge clusters (Nigeria, Columbia and Brazil accounted for 45.5% of country occurrences) and gaps (e.g. the Democratic Republic of Congo). There were knowledge clusters for interventions testing cultivar type, fertiliser use and diversifying crop rotations and outcomes related to crop production (e.g. yield/biomass). We found knowledge gaps for environmental interventions and outcomes (e.g. 5% of studies measured pollutants or wildlife). In terms of study design, reporting standards were poor (e.g. 24% of studies did not report start dates), average study duration was 2 years, and average publication delays were 4 years. The Kappa scores indicated that we successfully developed consistent ontologies (named Agri‐ontologies 1.0). The map and ontologies are available online: https://www.metadataset.com/. This systematic map of cassava farming practices can direct researchers and funders to knowledge gaps that need addressing, and reviewers to knowledge clusters for synthesis. Better research practices should be promoted within cassava research, as poor reporting standards, short study durations and long publication delays result in an ineffective research environment. This systematic map provides an evidence base for cassava production and the ontologies (Agri‐ontologies 1.0) can be applied to other systems to facilitate more efficient and effective synthesis. Here, we (a) produce a systematic map of cassava farming practices and (b) develop a standardised heirarchical classification system (Agri‐ontologies 1.0) for [1] farming interventions and [2] agricultural, economic and environmental outcomes. We mapped 1599 publications according to their interventions, outcomes, location, study year and study design. The systematic map provides an evidence base for sustainable cassava production, and the ontologies can be applied to other systems to facilitate more efficient and effective evidence syntheses.