Do predators keep prey healthy or make them sicker? A meta‐analysis

Ecological theory suggests that predators can either keep prey populations healthy by reducing parasite burdens or alternatively, increase parasitism in prey. To quantify the overall magnitude and direction of the effect of predation on parasitism in prey observed in practice, we conducted a meta‐an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcology letters Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 278 - 294
Main Authors Richards, Robert L., Drake, John M., Ezenwa, Vanessa O., Lafferty, Kevin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ecological theory suggests that predators can either keep prey populations healthy by reducing parasite burdens or alternatively, increase parasitism in prey. To quantify the overall magnitude and direction of the effect of predation on parasitism in prey observed in practice, we conducted a meta‐analysis of 47 empirical studies. We also examined how study attributes, including parasite type and life cycle, habitat type, study design, and whether predators were able to directly consume prey contributed to variation in the predator‐prey‐parasite interaction. We found that the overall effect of predation on parasitism differed between parasites and parasitoids and that whether consumptive effects were present, and whether a predator was a non‐host spreader of parasites, were the most important traits predicting the parasite response. Our results suggest that the mechanistic basis of predator‐prey interactions strongly influences the effects of predators on parasites and that these effects, although context dependent, are predictable. Ecological theory suggests that predators should keep prey populations healthy by reducing parasite burdens. We conducted a meta‐analysis to test this hypothesis. We found that the effect of predators on parasite in prey depended on the type of predator interaction differed between parasites and parasitoids.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 63
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Correspondence-3
ISSN:1461-023X
1461-0248
DOI:10.1111/ele.13919