Lower contact force predicts right pulmonary vein carina breakthrough after ablation index‐guided pulmonary vein isolation using high‐power short‐duration

Introduction Carina breakthrough (CB) at the right pulmonary vein (RPV) can occur after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) due to epicardial bridging or transient tissue edema. High‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation may increase the incidence of RPV CB. Currently, the surrogate of abl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 60 - 68
Main Authors Chen, Wei‐Tso, Chung, Fa‐Po, Lin, Yenn‐Jiang, Chang, Shih‐Lin, Lo, Li‐Wei, Hu, Yu‐Feng, Tuan, Ta‐Chuan, Chao, Tze‐Fan, Liao, Jo‐Nan, Lin, Chin‐Yu, Chang, Ting‐Yung, Kuo, Ling, Wu, Cheng‐I, Liu, Chih‐Min, Liu, Shin‐Huei, Hsieh, Yu‐Cheng, Li, Cheng‐Hung, Chen, Shih‐Ann
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Carina breakthrough (CB) at the right pulmonary vein (RPV) can occur after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) due to epicardial bridging or transient tissue edema. High‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation may increase the incidence of RPV CB. Currently, the surrogate of ablation parameters to predict RPV CB is not well established. This study investigated predictors of RPV CB in patients undergoing ablation index (AI)‐guided PVI with HPSD. Methods The study included 62 patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent AI‐guided PVI using HPSD. Patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of RPV CB. Lesions adjacent to the RPV carina were assessed, and CB was confirmed through residual voltage, low voltage along the ablation lesions, and activation wavefront propagation. Results Out of the 62 patients, 21 (33.87%) experienced RPV CB (Group 1), while 41 (66.13%) achieved first‐pass RPV isolation (Group 2). Despite similar AI and HPSD, patients with RPV CB had lower contact force (CF) at lesions adjacent to the RPV carina. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified CF < 10.5 g as a predictor of RPV CB, with 75.7% sensitivity and 56.2% specificity (area under the curve: 0.714). Conclusion In patients undergoing AI‐guided PVI with HPSD, lower CF adjacent to the carina was associated with a higher risk of RPV CB. These findings suggest that maintaining higher CF during ablation in this region may reduce the occurrence of RPV CB.
Bibliography:Disclosures
None.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1045-3873
1540-8167
DOI:10.1111/jce.16119