A population‐based time‐series analysis of opioid agonist treatment dispensed during pregnancy

Background and aims Identifying effective opioid treatment options during pregnancy is a high priority due to the growing prevalence of opioid use disorder across North America. We assessed the temporal impact of three population‐level interventions on the use of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) durin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAddiction (Abingdon, England) Vol. 119; no. 6; pp. 1111 - 1122
Main Authors Schmidt, Rose A., Everett, Karl, Perez‐Brumer, Amaya, Strike, Carol, Rush, Brian, Gomes, Tara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and aims Identifying effective opioid treatment options during pregnancy is a high priority due to the growing prevalence of opioid use disorder across North America. We assessed the temporal impact of three population‐level interventions on the use of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during pregnancy in Ontario, Canada. Design This was a population‐based time‐series analysis to identify trends in the monthly prevalence of pregnant people dispensed methadone and buprenorphine. The impact of adding buprenorphine/naloxone to the public drug formulary, the release of pregnancy‐specific guidance and the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic were assessed. Setting and participants The study was conducted in Ontario, Canada between 1 July 2013 and 31 March 2022, comprising people who delivered a live or stillbirth in any Ontario hospital during the study period. Measurements We identified any prescription for methadone or buprenorphine dispensed between the estimated conception date and delivery date and calculated the monthly prevalence of OAT‐exposed pregnancies among all pregnant people in Ontario. Findings Overall, rates of OAT during pregnancy have declined since mid‐2018. Methadone‐exposed pregnancies decreased from 0.46% of all pregnancies in Ontario in 2015 to a low of 0.16% in 2022. In the primary analysis, none of the interventions had a statistically significant impact on overall OAT rates; however, in the stratified analyses, there was a small increase in buprenorphine after the formulary change [0.006%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0032−0.0081, P < 0.0001] and a decrease in buprenorphine after the release of the 2017 guidelines (−0.005%, 95% CI = −0.0080 to −0.0020, P = 0.001) and the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic (−0.003%, 95% CI = −0.0054 to −0.0006, P = 0.015). Conclusion Despite changes in guidance and funding, opioid agonist treatment during pregnancy has been declining in Ontario, Canada since 2018.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0965-2140
1360-0443
1360-0443
DOI:10.1111/add.16459