Vector‐borne protozoan and bacterial pathogen occurrence and diversity in ectoparasites of the Egyptian Rousette bat
Bats are known reservoir hosts for a wide variety of parasites and pathogens, including bacteria and protozoans. Some of these pathogens are vector‐borne, and although their role is poorly studied, ectoparasites may contribute significantly to their transmission. The aim of this study was to molecul...
Saved in:
Published in | Medical and veterinary entomology Vol. 37; no. 2; pp. 189 - 194 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2023
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Bats are known reservoir hosts for a wide variety of parasites and pathogens, including bacteria and protozoans. Some of these pathogens are vector‐borne, and although their role is poorly studied, ectoparasites may contribute significantly to their transmission. The aim of this study was to molecularly detect the presence of vector‐borne microorganisms in bat‐associated ectoparasites to explore their diversity and distribution in these insects. We tested the presence of Bartonella spp., Polychromophilus spp., and Trypanosoma spp. in bat flies and bat fleas collected from 56 Egyptian Rousette bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus), using conventional PCR. We found a high prevalence of 43.9% (47/107) of Bartonella spp. in bat flies, but a low prevalence of 6.6% (4/61) in bat fleas. Polychromophilus and Trypanosoma DNA were absent in both bat flies and bat fleas. Furthermore, we found novel gltA Bartonella sequences, as well as genotypes that are highly similar to recently described and potentially zoonotic ones. Our results show high diversity of Bartonella in bat flies, however, their role in pathogen transmission is still unknown and should be further explored.
High diversity of Bartonella is present in parasitic bat flies.
Some Bartonella genotypes are highly similar to potentially zoonotic ones.
Presence of Polychromophilus and Trypanosoma was not detected in bat‐associated ectoparasites. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Philippe Christe and Olivier Glaizot equally contributed to this study. Tamara Szentiványi and Anne‐Caroline Heintz shared first authorship. Permits: We obtained permission to conduct research under Section 20 of the Animal Disease Act (Act No. 35 of 1984) from the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development of South Africa. This research was conducted with the approval of the University of Pretoria Animal Ethics committee (Project no. EC054‐14 and EC059‐14). Permits were obtained for bat sample collection from the South African provinces involved: the Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism Limpopo province directorate‐ wildlife permit no. CPM006806. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0269-283X 1365-2915 |
DOI: | 10.1111/mve.12639 |