Use of mononucleotide repeat markers for detection of microsatellite instability in mouse tumors
Tumors lacking DNA mismatch repair activity (MMR) from patients with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) or those with sporadic colorectal cancer can be identified by the presence of high levels of instability in repetitive sequences known as microsatellites (MSI). The assessment of MS...
Saved in:
Published in | Molecular carcinogenesis Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 285 - 292 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.12.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Tumors lacking DNA mismatch repair activity (MMR) from patients with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) or those with sporadic colorectal cancer can be identified by the presence of high levels of instability in repetitive sequences known as microsatellites (MSI). The assessment of MSI phenotype in human tumors helps to establish a clinical diagnosis and is accomplished with a reference panel of five mononucleotide repeats. By contrast, detection of MSI in mouse tumors has proven to be problematic and lack of a uniform set of markers for classification of MSI has impeded comparison of results between studies. We tested for MSI in intestinal tumors from MMR‐deficient mice with four mononucleotide repeats with polyA24‐37 tracts and three new markers with extended polyA59‐67 tracts. All seven markers were sensitive to MSI in MMR‐deficient tumors, but those with extended mononucleotide tracts displayed larger deletions, which were easily distinguishable from the germline alleles. With a panel of the five most sensitive and specific mononucleotide repeats, a high level of MSI was detected in 100% of MMR‐deficient tumors, but not in tumors with MMR activity. This novel panel is an improvement over existing combinations of mono‐ and dinucleotide repeat markers and should facilitate MSI screening and standardize results from different studies. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:984C57D356733C835317BE4F4CFC60C351153583 ark:/67375/WNG-18BCFQ4G-X ArticleID:MC20146 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0899-1987 1098-2744 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mc.20146 |