A single‐centre result of two courses of low‐intensity shockwave therapy (Li‐SWT) in erectile dysfunction

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of two courses of low‐intensity shock wave therapy (Li‐SWT) in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Between June 2015 and December 2020, diabetic and non‐diabetic patients with ED treated with two Li‐SWT courses were evaluated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAndrologia Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. e14324 - n/a
Main Author Geyik, Serdar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of two courses of low‐intensity shock wave therapy (Li‐SWT) in the treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). Between June 2015 and December 2020, diabetic and non‐diabetic patients with ED treated with two Li‐SWT courses were evaluated retrospectively among the data of 317 patients. The outcomes were evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function‐Erectile Function Domain (IIEF‐EF) questionnaire values at baseline and 6 months post‐treatment for each Li‐SWT course with (0.09 mJ/mm²) 18000 shock waves. Successful treatment criteria for patients who also underwent physical examination and anamnesis before and after each course were IIEF‐EF scores≥26 during the 6 months follow‐up. Forty‐one patients with a mean age of 51.61 ± 11.80 years were included in the study. The mean IIEF‐EF scores were 15.17 ± 3.75 at baseline, 21.61 ± 3.60 after the first course [mean difference(MD): −6.439; 95%, confidence interval(CI), −7.138: −5.740; t = −18.621; p < 0.001], and 25.27 ± 4.05 after the second course(MD: −3.658; 95% CI, −4,067: −3.249; t = −18,071; p < 0.001). Evaluation of score increases in diabetic patients was also statistically significant for each course (p < 0.001). Our study shows that two courses of Li‐SWT treatments are safe for both diabetic and non‐diabetic patients with ED and effective for each course.
Bibliography:Funding information
The author declared that this study received no financial support.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0303-4569
1439-0272
DOI:10.1111/and.14324