Variability of piglet birth weights: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

• Published in: Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition Vol. 104; no. 2; pp. 657 - 666
• Main Authors: Moreira, Rennan Herculano Rufino, Pérez Palencia, Jorge Yair, Moita, Vitor Hugo Cardoso, Caputo, Luciano Sales Santiago, Saraiva, Alysson, Andretta, Inês, Ferreira, Rony Antônio, Abreu, Márvio Lobão Teixeira
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.03.2020
• Subjects: amino acid; Amino acids; Amino Acids - administration & dosage; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Animals; Animals, Newborn; Birth Weight; Coefficient of variation; Dietary supplements; Female; Gestation; Hogs; Litter size; Meta-analysis; Pregnancy; Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; prolificacy; Reproduction; Standard deviation; Swine - physiology; Systematic review; uniformity; Variability; Variation; Weight reduction; uniformity; prolificacy; litter size; amino acid; gestation
• ISSN: 0931-2439; 1439-0396
• DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13264

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of litter size and supplementation of functional amino acids on the piglet birth weight variability through of a systematic review and meta‐analysis. PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus and SciELO are the main used databases and were searched in January 2019 by using the following keywords and their combinations: within‐litter birth, weight variability, piglets, litter size, sow, amino acids, gestation, uniformity, CV and/or SD. Of the 64 pre‐selected articles, only articles presenting the coefficients of variation and/or standard deviations according to the litter size and different levels of amino acid supplementation in the sow diets during gestation were selected. The average birth weights of total and live piglets were 43% lower in litters from sows with high prolificacy than those from sows with low prolificacy. The weight variability was affected by high prolificacy sows, with increases of 4.04% and 4.54% in the coefficients of variation of total and born alive piglets respectively (p = .074; p = .009). The standard deviation increased by 180 g in born alive piglets to high prolificacy sows. The coefficients of variation of total and live piglets born from high prolificacy sows showed an increase of 4.04% and 4.54% respectively (p = .07; p < .05). There was a tendency for reduced weight variability with amino acids supplementation when considering the standard deviation of total born (p = .072). However, reproductive performance was not significantly influenced (p > .05). In conclusion, the average litter weight and the number of piglets born influence weight variability. Amino acids supplementation may reduce the birth weight variability between piglets. However, this effect depends on the amino acid used, the levels of supplementation and on other factors not completely addressed in this study. Thus, more research is necessary to fully elucidate this topic.