Surface effects on magnetic properties of superparamagnetic magnetite nanoparticles

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4) 2 nm in size were produced by a co‐precipitation method. Superparamagnetic resonance (SPR) spectra at room temperature show a broad line with a Landé g ‐factor, g eff ≈ 2. It was observed that, as the temperature decreased to 24 K, the apparent re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysica status solidi. A, Applications and materials science Vol. 203; no. 7; pp. 1595 - 1601
Main Authors Köseoğlu, Y., Kavas, H., Aktaş, and B.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin WILEY-VCH Verlag 01.05.2006
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley-VCH
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Superparamagnetic nanoparticles of magnetite (Fe3O4) 2 nm in size were produced by a co‐precipitation method. Superparamagnetic resonance (SPR) spectra at room temperature show a broad line with a Landé g ‐factor, g eff ≈ 2. It was observed that, as the temperature decreased to 24 K, the apparent resonance field decreases while the line width considerably increases. We used a theoretical formalism based on a distribution of diameters or volumes of the nanoparticles. The nanoparticles behave as single magnetic domains with random orientations of magnetic moments which are subject to thermal fluctuations. A Landau–Lifshitz line shape function presents adequate results which are in good agreement with the experimental ones. A single set of parameters provides good fits to the spectra recorded at different temperatures. At high T the SPR line shape is governed by the core anisotropy and the thermal fluctuations. By decreasing the temperature, the magnetic susceptibility of shell spins increases. As a result of this, the surface spins produce an effective field on the core leading to a decrease of resonance field, B r. Also, the effective anisotropy increases as the shell spins begin to order. So, the results are interpreted by a simple model, in which each single‐domain nanoparticle is considered as a core–shell system, with magnetocrystalline anisotropy on the core and surface anisotropy on the shell. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
Bibliography:istex:4880FDA7BDB96B8193D2BAC711C54A559983EAAE
ArticleID:PSSA200563104
ark:/67375/WNG-3M74SFMF-T
ISSN:1862-6300
1862-6319
DOI:10.1002/pssa.200563104