Real‐world tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment pathways, monitoring patterns and responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in the United Kingdom: the UK TARGET CML study

Summary Management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has recently undergone dramatic changes, prompting the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) to issue recommendations in 2013; however, it remains unclear whether real‐world CML management is consistent with these goals. We report results of UK TARGET CML,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of haematology Vol. 192; no. 1; pp. 62 - 74
Main Authors Milojkovic, Dragana, Cross, Nicholas C. P., Ali, Sahra, Byrne, Jenny, Campbell, Gavin, Dignan, Fiona L., Drummond, Mark, Huntly, Brian, Marshall, Scott, McMullin, Mary Frances, Neelakantan, Pratap, Raghavan, Manoj, Sivakumaran, Muttuswamy, Tighe, Jane, Wandroo, Farooq, Willis, Fenella, Glen, Fiona, Fildes, Louise, Collington, Sarah J., Ryan, Jacqueline, Clark, Richard E., Mead, Adam J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has recently undergone dramatic changes, prompting the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) to issue recommendations in 2013; however, it remains unclear whether real‐world CML management is consistent with these goals. We report results of UK TARGET CML, a retrospective observational study of 257 patients with chronic‐phase CML who had been prescribed a first‐line TKI between 2013 and 2017, most of whom received first‐line imatinib (n = 203). Although 44% of patients required ≥1 change of TKI, these real‐world data revealed that molecular assessments were frequently missed, 23% of patients with ELN‐defined treatment failure did not switch TKI, and kinase domain mutation analysis was performed in only 49% of patients who switched TKI for resistance. Major molecular response (MMR; BCR‐ABL1IS ≤0·1%) and deep molecular response (DMR; BCR‐ABL1IS ≤0·01%) were observed in 50% and 29%, respectively, of patients treated with first‐line imatinib, and 63% and 54%, respectively, receiving a second‐generation TKI first line. MMR and DMR were also observed in 77% and 44% of evaluable patients with ≥13 months follow‐up, receiving a second‐generation TKI second line. We found little evidence that cardiovascular risk factors were considered during TKI management. These findings highlight key areas for improvement in providing optimal care to patients with CML.
Bibliography:The copyright line for this article was changed on 16 June 2020 after original online publication.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.16733